Even though we are all still wallowing in the greatness that is the Solar Bears and trying to learn everything about the ECHL, one thing is happening that could affect the Solar Bears (not so much in a bad way though).
It's that time of year err, decade... err period, whatever you want to call it, where the NHL and the Players' Association negotiate a new CBA. Yes, we all put with it with the NBA this past year and the NFL the year before that. For those of you who caught sight of this and though: "Oh crap, not 2005 again." may not too far off. According to tweets from Renard P Lavoie of RDS, here's what the owner's have submitted to the PA for the new CBA a couple weeks back:
If you're thinking to yourself "What the *%&!?" you're not the only one. Though some may think #3 & #5 may seem reasonable (and I use that term loosely), the other three are just flat out, outrageous. Sure, why not take a pay cut, wait for a raise, and take whatever we give you and like it? Remember though, this is after all, the first offer. The only logical reason of this would be to eventually "settle" what they really want, kind of like me wanting to buy a $150 hockey sweater for $100, and initially offer the seller $50 with hopes of settling for $100, but even that almost never works. If I really did that, the seller would just give me the middle finger and find someone who will negotiate a better offer.
With October just three months away and the current CBA set to expire on September 15, it'll be interesting to see what the PA will put in their counteroffer. And if there is a lockout, how it would affect the roster quality for the Solar Bears.
It's that time of year err, decade... err period, whatever you want to call it, where the NHL and the Players' Association negotiate a new CBA. Yes, we all put with it with the NBA this past year and the NFL the year before that. For those of you who caught sight of this and though: "Oh crap, not 2005 again." may not too far off. According to tweets from Renard P Lavoie of RDS, here's what the owner's have submitted to the PA for the new CBA a couple weeks back:
NHL proposal to players: 1-reduce players hockey related revenues to 46% from 57 %. 2-10 seasons in NHL before being UFA.
— Renaud P Lavoie (@RenLavoieRDS) July 14, 2012
3-contracts limites to 5 years 4-no more salary arbitration. 5- entry-level contract 5 years instead of 3.
— Renaud P Lavoie (@RenLavoieRDS) July 14, 2012
If you're thinking to yourself "What the *%&!?" you're not the only one. Though some may think #3 & #5 may seem reasonable (and I use that term loosely), the other three are just flat out, outrageous. Sure, why not take a pay cut, wait for a raise, and take whatever we give you and like it? Remember though, this is after all, the first offer. The only logical reason of this would be to eventually "settle" what they really want, kind of like me wanting to buy a $150 hockey sweater for $100, and initially offer the seller $50 with hopes of settling for $100, but even that almost never works. If I really did that, the seller would just give me the middle finger and find someone who will negotiate a better offer.
With October just three months away and the current CBA set to expire on September 15, it'll be interesting to see what the PA will put in their counteroffer. And if there is a lockout, how it would affect the roster quality for the Solar Bears.


